Sign in or 

|
Posted Anonymously |
Sound
Jul 18 2007, 6:06 PM EDT
One of the people asking questions explicitly turned down use of a microphone - I think because the acoustics in the room are good and everyone physically present could hear. More awareness is needed and probably briefing the chairs to be strict, if that's what helps online viewers follow the discussion :-)
Kriss Do you find this valuable?
Keyword tags:
None
|
|
apbl500 |
1. RE: Sound
Jul 19 2007, 6:54 AM EDT
HI Kriss,I'm all for technology not getting in the way. They guy was probably thinking on his feet, bursting to talk, and so didn't want to wait for a microphone before replying and losing his train of thought. If you start telling people to stop and wait until the online sound quality is good, they'll wonder if they're at a conference or a TV broadcast. On the other hand if you tell people that the microphone is needed for those in the room who are hard of hearing, they probably would accept that. So happily, our online audio needs can piggy back on the back of a local need transparently. This is much better, and similar to our transparent way of recording screen activity by piggy backing on the screen output being sent to the data projector. The presenter's didn't need to do anything special on their PCs/Macs for the screen recording to work, and that's how it should be. I don't know whether V/045 has a "hearing loop" - a system feeding in-room audio specially to hearing aids - but that is used in some lectures in York (Rob Stone mentioned it once.) Ideally all large lecture theatres should have this though. Anthony. Do you find this valuable? |
|
Posted Anonymously |
2. RE: Sound
Jul 19 2007, 12:48 PM EDT
"HI Kriss,It does have a hearing loop - quite a few of the large ones do. That's a good way of putting it, to persuade people to use the mikes. Maybe there's a need for more than one in use at a time. Kriss Do you find this valuable? |